Three Way News
Your Source. For everything. Really.
Contributors
- Hammer
- Jambo
- Libby Mae
Current Poll
Recurring features
Hammer's Favorites
- Dobson v. Sponge-Bob
- Calvin, the nest egg
- Pat's predictions
- Bachmann spins Cupertino
- 205 atheists assume the bench
- Fox spins Oil for Food
- Fact check: highest taxed state
- Gen. Myers v. Reality
- Janice Rogers Brown
- Killing Field
- Kline hates Big Bird
- Vote Luca Brasi!
- Cornyn's Stalinist Supreme Court
- Rumsfeld's hidden metrics
Jambo's Favories
- Dolphin research updates
- We all shine on
- If you have to write...
- Columnist NY Times should have
- Truth about taxes
- Fourth of July
- Movie objects
- Lost in supermarket
- Dysfunctional Farmer Labor party
- Punks you hated
- Some preacher from east
- Winning issues
Monday, October 31, 2005
Smilin' Norm v. Gorgeous George Galloway: Round 2
CP has a great post up walking us down memory lane with Sen. Smilin' Norm Coleman (R-MN) and George Galloway. Smilin' Norm has done a great job of hiding from both Galloway and his responsibilities as chair of the Senate's permanent subcommittee on investigations.
Until last week, at least, when Coleman and his ilk launched a new attack on Galloway, again claiming that Galloway personally profited from the Oil for Food corruption. I don't know if Galloway is corrupt or not. I only know this. Galloway danced circles around Coleman the last time they went toe-to-toe and I'd love to see that again.
I don't know this, but I read it on the prestigious Internet. Apparently, Tariq Aziz, purportedly a witness against Galloway, has "denied telling investigators that George Galloway personally profited from the UN oil-for-food programme for Iraq." It's not a good sign when your evidence starts falling apart before the trial.
