spacer

Three Way News

Your Source. For everything. Really.

Contributors

Current Poll

Best comic strip?

  • Bloom County
  • Boondocks
  • Calvin and Hobbes
  • Dilbert
  • Doonesbury
  • Far Side
  • Foxtrot
  • Get Fuzzy
  • Life in Hell
  • Peanuts
  • Pearls Before Swine
  • Pogo
  • Zippy the Pinhead
  
Free polls from Pollhost.com

Recurring features

Hammer's Favorites

Jambo's Favories

Wednesday, May 25, 2005

Memory hole

Posted by: Hammer / 8:40 AM

Smilin' Norm Coleman is still hiding behind his desk, hoping that mean old George Galloway will go away. Even better for the Smilin' Norm would be if George Galloway had never existed.

The Brad Blog has been following this closely -- Galloway's appearance before the Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs (Permanent Subcommittee on Investigatoins), is mysteriously absent from the Committee's website. You can find witness testimony from Charles Abell to Philip Zelikow, but nothing from George Galloway. You can search for Galloway, but you won't find anything.

Whose fault is that? The Brad Blog reports:

As we reported originally, Coleman's office passed the buck for the absense of Galloway's testimony on the website by telling The BRAD BLOG that, "Senator Coleman is the chairman, but the committee makes their own decisions about what goes on the website."

The Socialist Worker (UK) notes:

According to the site Galloway "did not make a statement" to the committee. This conflicts with the evidence of the live televised statement and the question and answer session the Respect MP for Bethnal Green & Bow gave to the investigations committee.

Then there was the massive press and media coverage from every part of the world, which seems to confirm that the MP did actually appear before the committee.

George Galloway said, "It seems I’ve been airbrushed from history. Senator Norm Coleman, who in a previous incarnation was a left winger, has clearly learned from Uncle Joe Stalin how to remove troublesome people from the historical record."

Just to prove I don't only go after conservative press bias, I'll note that the website actually says "Mr Galloway did not submit a written statement". It's called cut and paste. Journalism doesn't get much easier than that.

AND the link to the archived video is still wrong. The link tells you to go to "http://www.senate.gov/~gov_affairs/audio_video\051705video.ram". Clicking that link gives you a page not found error. The actual link is "http://www.senate.gov/~gov_affairs/audio_video/051705video.ram" (working link).

6 Comments:

That Stalin quote made me curious about what folks around here think about Christopher Hitchens's take on Galloway. I'm sure Hitchens's lefty bona fides has worn a little thin of late for a lot of people.

By Blogger Joseph Thvedt, at 9:40 AM  

Great link, thanks!
I'm not an admirer of Hitchens, but he has the guts to include Galloway's criticism of him: "He had evidently been admirably consistent in his attention to my humble work, because he changed tone and said that this was just what he'd expect from a 'drink-sodden ex-Trotskyist popinjay.' It takes a little more than this to wound your correspondent--I could still hold a martini without spilling it when I was 'the greatest polemicist of our age' in 2001--but please note that the real thrust is contained in the word 'Trotskyist.' Galloway says that the worst day of his entire life was the day the Soviet Union fell."

By Blogger Hammer, at 10:10 AM  

I don't think anyone who has paid much attention feels that Galloway is not a deeply flawed political figure, I believe Hammer even implied as much in one of his posts. That doesn't diminish the appeal of seeing Norm Coleman get a load of inconvenient facts crammed down his throat in front of an international audience. I also note that Hitchens does nothing to refute any of Galloway's actual statements. I don't think many of us here wish Galloway were our Senator or Representative but we sure wish some of the Democrats in this country would deliver his style of smack-down once in a while.

By Blogger Jambo, at 11:33 AM  

I also note that Hitchens does nothing to refute any of Galloway's actual statements.

No?

It would have been a simple matter for them to call him out on a number of things. First of all, and easiest, he had dared to state under oath that he had not been a defender of the Saddam regime. This, from the man who visited Baghdad after the first Gulf war and, addressing Saddam, said: "Sir, I salute your courage, your strength, your indefatigability."

and

At the hearing, also, Galloway was half-correct in yelling at the subcommittee that he had been a critic of Saddam Hussein when Donald Rumsfeld was still making friendly visits to Baghdad. Here, a brief excursion into the aridities of left history may elucidate more than the Galloway phenomenon.

Well, it wasn't all that brief, so I won't quote any more, but it's there in the article. He also goes into the more substantive question of Galloway's and Fawaz Zureikat's involvement in Oil-for-Food.

By Blogger Joseph Thvedt, at 9:12 PM  

I'm sorry, I was only referring to his attacks on Coleman. Thgose were the only parts that really interested me but I see that I did nothing in my comment to indicate that. I have no doubt there may have been massive corruption in the Oil for Food program. Maybe Galloway was involved, maybe he wasn't. I don't much care. I think the reason most of us on the left enjoyed his testimony was because he said all the things we wish Democrats would say about the Iraq war (and I do think I managed to get that across). If Galloway ends up being guilty of skimming a few million dollars that makes him a bad guy but it does not change his critique of American policy.

By Blogger Jambo, at 1:31 AM  

So far, at worst, Galloway is accused of receiving vouchers for 20 million barrels of oil. The original figure I read was that the vouchers could be sold for 30 cents.

By Blogger Hammer, at 7:22 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home

Blogroll

Special Feeds

Fun with Google

Search Tools

Technorati

Google

3WN WWW

Prior posts

  • A not very nice take on people who deserve no better
  • Disney defeats bigots
  • How much is that Silver Ring Thing in the window?
  • TWN vs. NYT
  • Minnesota 2nd district: Rowley in?
  • Republican Hopefuls
  • Traffic
  • More changes
  • "I'm all lost in the supermarket"
  • Archives

    • Gone for now

    This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours? Site Meter Get Firefox!