spacer

Three Way News

Your Source. For everything. Really.

Contributors

Current Poll

Best comic strip?

  • Bloom County
  • Boondocks
  • Calvin and Hobbes
  • Dilbert
  • Doonesbury
  • Far Side
  • Foxtrot
  • Get Fuzzy
  • Life in Hell
  • Peanuts
  • Pearls Before Swine
  • Pogo
  • Zippy the Pinhead
  
Free polls from Pollhost.com

Recurring features

Hammer's Favorites

Jambo's Favories

Thursday, July 07, 2005

Yeah, what he said

Posted by: Jambo / 12:26 PM

Brad DeLong says it as well as anybody today:

We mourn with the citizens of London.

We pledge to help track down and kill the perpetrators, the planners, and their helpers.

We note that it is 46 months after September 11, 2001, and that Osama bin Laden is still alive and at liberty. That somebody can plan September 11, 2001 and remain alive and at liberty provides powerful encouragement to those who think of following in his footsteps--including those who planned, aided, and carried out today's atrocity in London.

More attention to Osama bin Laden and his ilk, please. And less attention to using Osama bin Laden as a pretext for launching hair-brained neoconservative schemes, please.

One of the comments (replying to another comment) to his post I thought was quite good as well:
First, getting at the underlying conditions supporting terrorism does not exclude dealing with individual terrorist leaders. That's an entirely false dichotomy. The fact that the group claiming blame for the London bombings has attached itself, if only in name, to al-Qaeda, is evidence of the power of that name in the aftermath of al-Qaeda sponsored attacks on the US. Five years ago, there groups were working under their own names. Now, they use the al-Qaeda name for effect. A-Qaeda and bin Laden are far from irrelevant.

Saddam provided cash to terrorists? Yeah, but so did lots of governments around the world, including the governments of Israel and the US. We just call them freedom fighters or phalangists or Christian militias or whatever. Going after nations that support terrorism makes for a long list. The problem is that terrorist attacks have increased worldwide since the US invaded Iraq. Even excluding attacks inside Iraq, the count is up. If the point to invading Iraq was to reduce the risk of terrorism, it doesn't seem to be working. Feel-good wars just don't cut it.

2 Comments:

I hope you're joking - Brad delong's response is pathetic.

By Anonymous Anonymous, at 11:55 PM  

Not at all, I think it is a perfect response. Let's get the Islamic terrorists and their ilk who attacked us on 9-11 and London today and not get involved in pointless crusades like Iraq that have done nothing to make us safer. And not only have they failed to make us safer, they have had the opposite effect. Our ability to fight elsewhere has been severely weakened, we have alienated allies we need, we have lost over 1700 Americans, and close to half a trillion dollars, and provided a training ground and recruiting poster for future terrorists. Just as OBL and company learned their skills fighting the Soviets in the 1980s the terrorists of 2015 are getting a crash course in Iraq even as we speak. Nice job W.

By Blogger Jambo, at 12:29 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home

Blogroll

Special Feeds

Fun with Google

Search Tools

Technorati

Google

3WN WWW

Prior posts

  • Multiple explosions rock London
  • Activist judges, by the numbers
  • Judith Miller jailed!
  • Controlling the message
  • The parable of Kerri Strug
  • Smilin' Norm: Loves the issue, hates the solution
  • CAFTA kudos go to Coleman
  • A sad map, no matter what color
  • July 4th in the city vs. July 4th in the 'burbs
  • Archives

    • Gone for now

    This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours? Site Meter Get Firefox!