Three Way News
Your Source. For everything. Really.
Contributors
- Hammer
- Jambo
- Libby Mae
Current Poll
Recurring features
Hammer's Favorites
- Dobson v. Sponge-Bob
- Calvin, the nest egg
- Pat's predictions
- Bachmann spins Cupertino
- 205 atheists assume the bench
- Fox spins Oil for Food
- Fact check: highest taxed state
- Gen. Myers v. Reality
- Janice Rogers Brown
- Killing Field
- Kline hates Big Bird
- Vote Luca Brasi!
- Cornyn's Stalinist Supreme Court
- Rumsfeld's hidden metrics
Jambo's Favories
- Dolphin research updates
- We all shine on
- If you have to write...
- Columnist NY Times should have
- Truth about taxes
- Fourth of July
- Movie objects
- Lost in supermarket
- Dysfunctional Farmer Labor party
- Punks you hated
- Some preacher from east
- Winning issues
Monday, April 10, 2006
Nuke Iran
Is it time to nuke Iran? No. Even if you ignore the large difference between Hiroshima-type weapons and focused, tactical nuclear weapons, the net effect of unleashing nuclear weapons against Iran would be huge and negative. If we announce we're willing to use nuclear weapons against a Muslim country -- with no direct ties to recent attacks against the United States -- then the voices calling for jihad against America will sound all the more reasonable to millions of young men who do not want to be vaporized.
Oh, and all the flap about uranium and Niger? We could've avoided all that if the administration had heeded the National Intelligence Council's report. According to the Washington Post the NIC concluded that "The Niger story was baseless and should be laid to rest."
