spacer

Three Way News

Your Source. For everything. Really.

Contributors

Current Poll

Best comic strip?

  • Bloom County
  • Boondocks
  • Calvin and Hobbes
  • Dilbert
  • Doonesbury
  • Far Side
  • Foxtrot
  • Get Fuzzy
  • Life in Hell
  • Peanuts
  • Pearls Before Swine
  • Pogo
  • Zippy the Pinhead
  
Free polls from Pollhost.com

Recurring features

Hammer's Favorites

Jambo's Favories

Wednesday, November 29, 2006

When I get there I'm going with Origin of Species

Posted by: Jambo / 12:45 AM

Pardon my language, but Jesus fuckin' Christ, where do they get these idiots?

Keith Ellison, D-Minn., the first Muslim elected to the United States Congress, has announced that he will not take his oath of office on the Bible, but on the bible of Islam, the Koran. He should not be allowed to do so -- not because of any American hostility to the Koran, but because the act undermines American civilization.

And I'm not even going to get into the fact that the Constitution specifically prohibits the use of any religious test for holding office.

6 Comments:

One more quote from the column:

Insofar as a member of Congress taking an oath to serve America and uphold its values is concerned, America is interested in only one book, the Bible. If you are incapable of taking an oath on that book, don't serve in Congress.

That is egregiously stupid.

By Blogger Hammer, at 8:01 AM  

That article just keeps getting dumber & dumber:

When all elected officials take their oaths of office with their hands on the very same book, they all affirm that some unifying value system underlies American civilization. If Keith Ellison is allowed to change that, he will be doing more damage to the unity of America and to the value system that has formed this country than the terrorists of 9-11.

I like Jambo's idea of taking the oath on Darwin. But seriously, does taking the oath on any text other than the Constitution make sense?

By Blogger Joey de Vivre, at 8:54 AM  

The idea of an oath on a Bible is based on the fanciful notion that if one lied after swearing on the Bible, harsh consequences would result. (If not the dramatic bolt of lightning, then eternal damnation.) It's the 21st century -- why don't we just hook our representatives up to lie detectors and ask them whether they intend to defend the Constitution?

By Blogger Hammer, at 9:12 AM  

not to mention the fact that not only have some people taken oaths on other religious texts, but a few *gasp* haven't used anything at all...

curse you teddy roosevelt

By Blogger rew, at 10:58 AM  

I was considering coming up with a defense of Mr. Prager, but I have to concede - it's a horrible argument from beginning to end. At one point, he argues

Would they allow him to choose Hitler's "Mein Kampf," the Nazis' bible, for his oath? And if not, why not? On what grounds will those defending Ellison's right to choose his favorite book deny that same right to a racist who is elected to public office?

Though he uses the words, he neglects the fact that these are people who are 'elected'. They represent the people. The way people will deny that same right to a racist is by not electing him/her to a public office.

By Anonymous Anonymous, at 2:14 PM  

-MM

By Anonymous Anonymous, at 2:16 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home

Blogroll

Special Feeds

Fun with Google

Search Tools

Technorati

Google

3WN WWW

Prior posts

  • Time to trade in the Prius?
  • What do you do when the morgue is full?
  • Yup -- me, too
  • You'll shoot your eye out kid!
  • Krugman on FL-13
  • Chaos -- terrible, terrible chaos
  • Republican congress cuts and runs
  • How good are Cohen's contracts?
  • Stay this course?
  • Archives

    • Gone for now

    This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours? Site Meter Get Firefox!