spacer

Three Way News

Your Source. For everything. Really.

Contributors

Current Poll

Best comic strip?

  • Bloom County
  • Boondocks
  • Calvin and Hobbes
  • Dilbert
  • Doonesbury
  • Far Side
  • Foxtrot
  • Get Fuzzy
  • Life in Hell
  • Peanuts
  • Pearls Before Swine
  • Pogo
  • Zippy the Pinhead
  
Free polls from Pollhost.com

Recurring features

Hammer's Favorites

Jambo's Favories

Monday, August 08, 2005

Academic freedom and censorship

Posted by: Hammer / 9:20 AM

The Religiously Correct are just hammering the last nail in a new frame for their specious arguments on intelligent design: it's all about academic freedom and censorship:

"There are only a tiny minority of people who don't believe that, who don't believe in free speech on evolution," he explains. "Unfortunately, they happen to be in some of the places of power. And so it's very good and we're very pleased that President Bush has come out on the side of academic freedom on evolution -- not on the side of censorship."

West says the Discovery Institute opposes mandating the teaching of intelligent design in schools, but supports requiring students to know about scientific criticisms of Darwinian evolution. State science standards in three states -- Ohio, New Mexico, and Minnesota -- require students to know such information.

Yes, science should no longer be moored by empiricism. It's time to base all scientific discussion on the principles of freedom of speech. Rather than teach our children what a bunch of scientists have to say, let's have our children base their scientific understanding on the snazziest PowerPoint presentation. I vote for the one with the cool animated monkey!


By the by, the Minnesota standards are here (Word document). A few things our children are expected to learn in high school:

In other words, Minnesota's science standards do not specifically require students to know scientific criticisms of evolution. Although to the extent that scientific criticisms of any theory exist, students should be exposed to those ideas. Scientists don't object to science: they object to belief masquerading as theory.

1 Comments:

You should reprint Steve Sack's edit. cartoon from last week on Intelligent Geography.

By Anonymous therealrepublican, at 9:49 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home

Blogroll

Special Feeds

Fun with Google

Search Tools

Technorati

Google

3WN WWW

Prior posts

  • Roberts on the Moot Court
  • Missing words
  • Lost luggage and no wireless network
  • Redistributing wealth--From Bill to Steve
  • Oh, just go read Paul Krugman
  • Oklahoma's book burning club
  • The unfairness of accuracy
  • At least he didn't expose his breasts
  • Romer v. Evans, FRC report
  • Archives

    • Gone for now

    This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours? Site Meter Get Firefox!