Three Way News
Your Source. For everything. Really.
Contributors
- Hammer
- Jambo
- Libby Mae
Current Poll
Recurring features
Hammer's Favorites
- Dobson v. Sponge-Bob
- Calvin, the nest egg
- Pat's predictions
- Bachmann spins Cupertino
- 205 atheists assume the bench
- Fox spins Oil for Food
- Fact check: highest taxed state
- Gen. Myers v. Reality
- Janice Rogers Brown
- Killing Field
- Kline hates Big Bird
- Vote Luca Brasi!
- Cornyn's Stalinist Supreme Court
- Rumsfeld's hidden metrics
Jambo's Favories
- Dolphin research updates
- We all shine on
- If you have to write...
- Columnist NY Times should have
- Truth about taxes
- Fourth of July
- Movie objects
- Lost in supermarket
- Dysfunctional Farmer Labor party
- Punks you hated
- Some preacher from east
- Winning issues
Friday, June 03, 2005
How'd that get in there?
A New York Times article this morning about parents' opposition to their children joining the military contained this surprising bit of information:No Child Left Behind mandates that school districts can receive federal funds only if they grant military recruiters "the same access to secondary school students" as is provided to colleges and employers.
As a friend said today, the only time no child will be left behind is when the big C-130 takes off for Iraq.
2 Comments:
So all the info I've heard from liberals the last few years that No Child Left Behind is a federal mandate with no funding behind it would be false?
By 
, at
9:20 AM
The liberals' complaint is that Bush promised more funding than was actually delivered. NCLB is underfunded, not unfunded.
<< Home
